Here is another part of the muddled history of stereology.

In 1847, the French mining engineer and geologist, Auguste Delesse, demonstrated that the expected valuefor[sic] volume fraction of an object varies in direct proportion to the observed area fraction of the object’s profile on a random section through the material containing the objects of interest. Today, by point counting, a derivative of the Delesse Principle, provides the basis for accurate and efficient estimates for object and regions volumes.

The first obvious muddled issue is the name. The first name of Delesse is Achille, not Auguste. The name Auguste is the first name of Rosiwal. Is this part of the confusion?

Delesse was interested in what is known as modal analysis. He wanted to know what fraction of the rocks were of a particular type of mineral. He developed a technique so arduous to accomplish that he only performed it a few times and no one else did it.

Delesse did not use random sections. One of the big questions was the orientation that should be used. Those same issues would be discussed well into the 1950s by Chayes.

Is modern point counting a derivative of the Delesse principle. Not really. Point counting had an independent origin. The work had nothing to do with modal analysis. The original work was not even related to volumes. The mathematics might look similar and there is a mathematical relation, but the fact is that point counting was not derived from either Delesse’s work, or Rosiwal’s work.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Tags: science

This entry was posted on March 26, 2012 at 9:08 am and is filed under Introduction, Stereology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

March 27, 2012 at 7:13 am |

Hey ,

I have an idea to straighten out these muddles about the History of Stereology.

With best wishes,

Name withheld on request of the poster

March 27, 2012 at 7:19 am |

Please state your idea?